I've been fascinated with science fiction stories for as long as I
can remember, although, I must confess, I never thought of science
fiction as being mainstream literature. I, like many readers, pursued
science fiction as a form of escapism, a way to keep up with speculation
on recent scientific discoveries, or just a way to pass the time.
It
wasn't until I met with my thesis adviser to celebrate the approval of
my paper that I had to think about science fiction in a new light. My
adviser works for a large, well-known literary foundation that is
considered to be very "canonical" in its tastes. When he asked me if I
liked science fiction, and if I would be willing to select about one
hundred stories for possible inclusion in an anthology that they were
thinking about producing, I was somewhat surprised. When he told me it
might lead to a paying gig, I became even more astounded. I went home
that afternoon feeling very content: my paper had been approved, and I
might get a paying job to select science fiction, of all things.
Then
it hit me: I'd actually have to seriously think about some sort of a
method to select from the thousands of science fiction short stories
that had been written in the past century. When I considered that the
ideals of the foundation would have to be reflected in the stories which
I selected, something near panic set in: science fiction was not part
of the "cannon."
"While I pondered weak and weary, over many a
quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore," I reached a decision: I'd
first try to figure out what science fiction "was," and then I'd develop
a set of themes that related to the essence of science fiction. So,
armed with this battle plan, I proceeded to read what several famous
authors had to say about science fiction. This seemed simple enough,
until I discovered that no two authors thought science fiction meant
quite the same thing. Oh, great, thought I: "nevermore." (Sorry, Edgar, I
couldn't resist).
Having failed to discover the essence of
science fiction, I selected four authors whose work I liked to try to
determine what they contributed to the art of science fiction. The
authors were: Isaac Asimov, Robert Silverberg, Orson Scott Card, and
Arthur C Clarke. At the time, I didn't realize that two of the authors,
Asimov and Clarke were considered "hard" science fiction writers, and
the other two, Silverberg and Card, were considered "soft" science
fiction writers.
No comments:
Post a Comment